So far, this section has discussed two players, Jim Kaat and Tommy John. It has left out the most often talked about “snub” from the Hall of Fame, Bert Blylevyn. This is not because we feel Mussina is inferior to Blylevyn, although admittedly, Moose’s numbers don’t stack up as well against his as they do against John’s or Kaat’s. It’s due instead to the fact that, in all likelihood, Blylevyn will be in the Hall soon, whereas John and Kaat will not.

Bery Blylevyn has been on the ballot for eleven years. During that time, his percentage of votes has climbed significantly. His first year, he appeared on only 17.5% of ballots–75% is needed for election. However, this number has climbed to 61.9% in 2008, up 14% from the previous year. While 2009 may not be the year for Blylevyn, we’re confident that he will make his Cooperstown speech soon.

By comparison, Tommy John appeared on 21.3% of the ballots in his first year and has seen that number rise to only 29.1% in 14 seasons. If he gets in, it will be through the veterans committee.

Kaat has already come and gone on the ballot, coming in at 19.5%, peaking four years later at 29.6%, and exiting in 2003 at 26.2%. Like John, Kaat never picked up the momentum, and will need to get in on the veterans committee.

Written by 

2 thoughts on “Update on “If he’s in, don’t they have to be in too?”

  1. Why does everyone assume that Blylevyn has been snubbed by the Hall of Fame? Blylevyn isn’t in the Hall of Fame because he was never great! He only had a 53.4% career winning percentage. Sure, he had a lot of shutouts, complete games, and strikeouts but he played in an era of low-scoring games where pitchers were expected to pitch deep into games.

    Blylevyn was a slightly better than average pitcher who just happened to pitch for a long time – that is why he racked up big numbers throughout his career. But he only finished in the top-5 in the Cy Young voting 3 times. To call Blylevyn a “great pitcher” is laughable at best!

Leave a Reply